This book?

Fantastic. A page-turner if there ever was one.
I think I remember Cyn recommending this, but I finally borrowed a copy from Tory. I needed to fall into a book bad. Last week was hella hectic and I was exhausted. I need Phil time: to wrap myself into a book, get centered and focused, and drop some of my other committments.
The book has a great plot, the premise is original and playful, and it blends in some incredibly interesting mythology.
Other books kinda being read right now:
Palestine by Joe Sacco. Graphic journalism about Sacco's stay in Palestine around 91-92.
I and Thou by Martin Buber. Some theology mixed in with a philosophy of relating to the world and each other as "Thou"s and not "It"s. Heavy on importance of dialogue. I know I'm not understanding most of this book.
And extended passage from Buber:
I consider a Tree.
I can look on it as a picture: stiff column in a shock of light, or splash of green shot with the delicate blue and silver of the background.
I can percieve it as movement: flowing veins on clinging, pressing pith, suck of the roots,breathing of the leaves, ceaseless commerce with earth and air -- and the obscure growth itself.
I can classify it in a species and study it as a type in its structure and mode of life.
I can subdue its actual presence and form so sternly that I recognise it only as an expression of law-- of the laws in accordance with which a constant opposition of forces is contiually adjusted, or of those in accordance with which the component substances mingle and seperate.
I can dissipate it and perpetuate it in number, in pure numerical relation.
In all this the tree remains my object, occupies space and time, and has its nature and constitution.
It can, however, also come about, if I have both will and grace, that in considering the tree I become bound up in relation to it. The tree is now no longer
It. I have been seized by the power of exclusiveness.
To effect this it is not necessary for me to give up any of the ways in which I consider the tree. There is nothing from which I would have to turn my eyes away in order to see, and no knowledge that I would have to forget. Rather is everything, picture and movement, species, and type, law and number, indivisibly united in this event.
Everything belonging to the tree is in this: its form and stucture, its colours, and chemical composition, its intercouse with the elements and with the stars are all present in a single whole. The tree is no impression, no play of my imagination, no value depending on my mood; but it is bodied ever against me and has to do with me, as I with it-- only in a different way.
Let no attempt be made to sap the strength from the meaning of the relation: relation is mutual.
The tree will have a consciousness, then similar to our own? Of that I have no experience. But do you wish, through seeming to succeed in it with yourself, once aganst to disintegrate that which cannnot be disintegrated?I encounter no soul or dryad of the tree, but the tree itself.